The h4831sc load data Diaries
The h4831sc load data Diaries
Blog Article
Your session is going to timeout on account of inactivity. Simply click Okay to increase your time and energy for an extra 0 minutes.
I gave up on it and went to other powder once the new powder was producing extra stress and was slower in comparison to the aged things. I do not try to remember if I even tried typical h4831 or not; I'm contemplating not. Click on to broaden...
This is amongst the major explanations reloaders are admonished to implement new data only; and to start out minimal each time you get a completely new large amount of powder. You do not genuinely know (Unless of course the company lets you know so) that your new wide range of powder was even produced at the identical manufacturing unit since the powder you bought a several years back.
I have experienced several rifles that fouled actually poor. Having many of the copper out was an actual PIA till I found Wipe-Out foaming bore cleaner.
INgunner54 stated: It's been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to try. Observed a node and shot some teams.
It is most likely that no further more dialogue is needed, through which case we endorse commencing a whole new thread. If having said that you feel your reaction is necessary you are able to however accomplish that.
Hodgdon H4831SC (Brief Lower) extruded rifle propellant can be a prime choice for huge recreation hunters who use handloader rifles. Introduced within the 1950s, this propellant has been enhanced with shorter grain measurements which makes it possible for greater powder movement plus more uniformity.
Anyhow, I wanted to give some 7828SC a try and decrease a number of the compression. What a miscalculation, I couldn't get this powder to shoot correctly or develop the velocities I get with typical 7828.
WA I'd personally recommend a slower burner which will give far better situation density like H1000 or IMR 7977, particularly if you are loading heavies extended.
Ballistically, this Extreme Extruded powder is the exact copy of H4831. Physically, it's a shorter grain dimensions, hence, the designation SC or short Lower. The shorter, extra compact kernels enable the powder to move through the powder measures h4831sc a lot more easily, helping to relieve the consistent slicing of granules.
As for the 4831 vs 4831SC, They are really the exact same/identical powder cept for grain sizing. Load data is interchangeable.
It's been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to try. Uncovered a node and shot some groups. I shot a .six five shot team these days. It is really just a little slower than H1000, but shoots good. Thanks for the recommendation, It really is superior to realize that I have got selections when 1 or the opposite powder is dried up.
Am i able to presume that H4831 is usually substituted for H4831sc ? I realize the Actual physical distinction but will it have an affect on the h4831sc load data burn or velocity? I feel not but I am not 100% confident.
I sawed 1 in fifty percent to discover how thick the jackets were being, and they were very easily two times as thick like a 50-grain hollow position was. Ditto for that sixty four-grain Electric power Issue, as these bullets are built for deer, not h4831sc prairie dogs or woodchucks. You now know every thing I know about the 22-250 and slow-burning powders, and I do not know anything at all concerning the 223. I doubt that you are going to get any where with that cartridge and 4831, but let's understand how it goes.